SAGEAgent: A Self-Evolving Agent for Cost-Aware Modality Acquisition in Multimodal Survival Prediction

Abstract: Does every cancer patient truly need a complete diagnostic workup for accurate survival prediction? In multimodal clinical oncology, diagnostic modalities follow a clinically mandated order of escalating burden -- from demographics collected at intake to genomic profiling requiring specialized tissue analysis. Current multimodal survival methods either assume all modalities are available or passively handle missing data, but none actively reason about whether acquiring the next modality is justified for a given patient along this ordered workflow. We formulate this as a sequential decision problem and propose SAGEAgent (Sequential Acquisition Guided by Experience), a self-evolving LLM-based clinical agent that decides which diagnostic modalities to acquire for each patient, balancing predictive accuracy against clinical invasiveness. SAGEAgent reasons about each patient's evolving diagnostic state through clinical tools that translate numerical predictions into text, an episodic memory that retrieves similar past cases, and a semantic memory that accumulates reusable decision patterns from experience. Experiments on a glioma cohort combining TCGA-LGG, TCGA-GBM, and BraTS with four diagnostic modalities demonstrate that SAGEAgent achieves competitive survival prediction accuracy while reducing average acquisition burden by 55%.
Submission history
Access Paper:
Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation


arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Funding
All newsiLENS: Interpretable LLM-Guided Mixture-of-Experts for Neuroimaging Survival Analysis
arXiv:2607.08778v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder that continues to impact millions of people worldwide. Predicting AD conversion during the prodromal stage remains critical for disease understanding and patient ca…
Read at arXiv cs.AILongMedBench: Benchmarking Medical Agents for Long-Horizon Clinical Decision-Making
arXiv:2607.09322v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this work, we introduce LongMedBench, a real-world EHR-based benchmark for long-horizon clinical decision-making. Prior evaluations of LLM-based medical agents have largely emphasized short-context knowledge QA and tool use. How…
Read at arXiv cs.AIL-MAD: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Agent Debate Structures in Legal Reasoning
arXiv:2607.09099v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While multi-agent debate (MAD) frameworks have shown significant potential in general reasoning, their effectiveness in highly structured, knowledge-heavy legal domains remains under-explored. In this work, we introduce the Legal M…
Read at arXiv cs.AIHERO: A Heterogeneity-Aware Benchmark Library for Federated Continual Learning
arXiv:2607.08784v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated continual learning (FCL) evaluates how distributed clients learn from changing data streams while retaining previously learned knowledge. Existing evaluations are difficult to compare because they often change datasets,…
Read at arXiv cs.AI