Evolutionary Intelligence for Scientific Discovery: From Evolutionary Computation to Cumulative Discovery Systems

Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is shifting scientific discovery from task-specific workflows towards autonomous systems that organize exploration with experimental and human feedback in open-ended candidate spaces. Evolutionary computation (EC) provides a computational basis for feedback-driven discovery because population-based search can maintain diverse scientific candidates while steering exploration through accumulated evidence. However, EC predominantly focuses on candidate refinement for predefined problems, whereas cumulative discovery requires experience retention. To bridge this gap, this review introduces evolutionary intelligence (EI) for scientific discovery. EI characterizes scientific AI systems that sustain exploration by linking candidate refinement with experience retention across evolutionary cycles. We introduce a five-dimensional analytical framework that asks what evolves, how candidates change, why candidates are selected, where feedback originates, and when evolution occurs. This framework clarifies how EI transforms isolated search trajectories into cumulative scientific insight. We further demonstrate this paradigm across diverse discovery modes, from evolving concrete scientific entities to orchestrating automated research workflows. Finally, we identify critical bottlenecks regarding evaluation, process traceability, and shared infrastructure, providing a concrete roadmap for advancing the transition from EC to EI in scientific discovery.
Submission history
Access Paper:
Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation


arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Agents
All newsARCANA: A Reflective Multi-Agent Program Synthesis Framework for ARC-AGI-2 Reasoning
arXiv:2607.09059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present ARCANA, a collaborative multi agent framework for solving ARC AGI 2 tasks under strict test time and hardware constraints. ARCANA decomposes each task into iterative perception, hypothesis generation, symbolic execution,…
Read at arXiv cs.AIGATS: Graph-Augmented Tree Search with Layered World Models for Efficient Agent Planning
arXiv:2607.08894v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise in multi-step planning tasks, but existing approaches like LATS (Language Agent Tree Search) and ReAct rely heavily on LLM inference during planning, leading to high computationa…
Read at arXiv cs.AILong-Horizon-Terminal-Bench: Testing the Limits of Agents on Long-Horizon Terminal Tasks with Dense Reward-Based Grading
arXiv:2607.08964v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents have become capable of autonomously completing short, well-specified tasks. However, existing terminal benchmarks largely focus on simple problems that finish within minutes and are evaluated only by their final outcome.…
Read at arXiv cs.AINeuro-Agentic Control: A Deep Learning-based LLM-Powered Agentic AI Framework for Controlling Security Controls
arXiv:2607.09076v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cyberattacks on operational technology are increasingly causing costly downtime and physical damage, exposing the limitations of traditional rule-based monitoring in industrial IoT environments. While Large Language Models (LLMs) h…
Read at arXiv cs.AI