Blockchain-Linked Auditable Decision Management for Telecom/IoT Fraud-Control Requests

Abstract: Telecom fraud-control studies often stop at detector-level classification, but deployment use requires request-level policy resolution, lifecycle traceability, and auditability. This paper reframes fraud control as blockchain-linked auditable decision management for synthetic telecom/IoT fraud-control requests, and its main result is that the QLoRA-tuned LLM branch becomes much more usable than zero-shot prompting but mainly approaches, rather than outperforms, a lower-cost centralized ensemble. The framework maps each synthetic deployment record to a managed request, blocks explicit out-of-boundary cases through a deterministic hard-fraud gate, scores non-hard requests using centralized ML (M1), federated meta-learning (M2), or LLM-family risk sources (M3), and resolves actions through a shared five-state policy, two-zone refinement mechanism, and local Ethereum-compatible audit layer. Evaluation uses separate synthetic training data and a 100,000-record deployment replay corpus, so the study should be read as controlled drift-replay evidence rather than field validation or proof of live deployability. On validation, M1 gives the strongest balance, with legitimate-request FPR 0.0890 under the 0.10 operating cap and soft-fraud recall 0.8341. On labeled deployment replay, however, the legitimate-FPR gap becomes large: M1 rises to 0.1646 and M3-QLoRA to 0.1801, while M3-QLoRA reduces the M3-Base legitimate FPR from 0.3915 and reaches 0.8240 soft-fraud recall. Blockchain telemetry shows that lifecycle gas, cost, latency, and throughput differences are driven by submitted off-chain decision profiles rather than changes in fraud logic.
Submission history
Access Paper:

Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation


arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Policy
All newsKnowledge Graphs and Explainable AI as Complementary Resources for Urban Mining
arXiv:2607.09578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pre-demolition assessment, the regulated audit process at the heart of urban mining, is an information process in which AI support must serve qualified auditors who remain accountable for the decisions taken. The relevant unit of v…
Read at arXiv cs.AIMulti-Conditioned Diffusion Synthesis of Sand Boils for Low-Resource Earthen-Levee Inspection
arXiv:2607.08794v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sand boils on earthen levees are safety-critical defects, but pixel-level detection is limited by scarce annotations. We present a diffusion-based synthesis pipeline for low-resource sand-boil imagery. Using Stable Diffusion XL f…
Read at arXiv cs.AIInterval Certifications for Multilayered Perceptrons via Lattice Traversal
arXiv:2607.08773v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this work we present a rigorous theoretical framework to a foundational problem of AI safety, namely adversarial robustness. In particular, we show that the adversarial robustness problem can be reduced to a lattice traversal pr…
Read at arXiv cs.AIPrompt-Driven Exploration
arXiv:2607.08837v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Exploration is essential to RL since a policy cannot improve by repeatedly sampling the behaviors it already prefers. Standard methods inject stochasticity in the action space, but such jitter only yields rollouts close to the or…
Read at arXiv cs.AI