Letting the Data Speak: Extracting Keywords from Crowdsourced Collections with AI

Abstract: Identifying and assigning keywords at scale is a technical, practical, and ethical challenge for crowdsourced collections. This article reports the findings of the "Extracting Keywords from Crowdsourced Collections" project, which used the Their Finest Hour Online Archive, a crowdsourced Second World War digital collection hosted by the University of Oxford, as a case study. The project evaluated three Natural Language Processing approaches to automate keyword extraction: Named Entity Recognition, Keyword Extraction, and Topic Modelling. It tested these approaches across a range of artificial intelligence techniques, from traditional statistical methods to modern GenAI neural networks. Our quantitative and qualitative findings indicate that Natural Language Processing approaches offer real potential for keyword extraction at scale in crowdsourced collections, but that no single method offers a complete solution and that model choice significantly shapes results. We argue that in crowdsourced collections, where metadata is the direct product of engagement with living contributors, automated keyword extraction raises distinct stewardship responsibilities that must be addressed alongside technical performance. Open-weight, extractive models emerge from our evaluation as best placed to support responsible deployment, while generative AI, despite its abstractive potential, introduces accountability risks that anyone managing crowdsourced collections should weigh carefully.
Submission history
Access Paper:
Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation


arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Research
All newsMedRealMM: A Real-World Multimodal Benchmark for Chinese Online Medical Consultation
arXiv:2607.09142v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in online medical consultation, yet existing benchmarks remain poorly aligned with real clinical practice. Many rely on synthetic conversations or patient simulators, omit pati…
Read at arXiv cs.AICogniConsole: Externalizing Inference-Time Control as a Formal Abstraction for Reliable LLM Interactions
arXiv:2607.08774v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliability in large language model (LLM) systems is typically framed as a function of model capability. We challenge this by demonstrating that reliability is significantly influenced by \emph{inference-time control} -- the comput…
Read at arXiv cs.AIA Formalization of the Mean-Field Derivation of the Vlasov Equation: AI-Assisted Lean Formalization as a Strategy Game
arXiv:2607.08986v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We formalize a research result in the Lean 4 proof assistant by having a mathematician direct an AI system, and frame the activity as a formalization game. The objective is to turn a LaTeX document into Lean. The game is won when t…
Read at arXiv cs.AIHow Does Bayesian Causal Discovery Fail? Characterising Structural Consequences in Linear Gaussian Networks under Latent Confounding
arXiv:2607.09449v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bayesian causal discovery is widely used for its ability to quantify epistemic uncertainty over directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) through posterior inference. However, its behaviour under latent confounding remains poorly understood,…
Read at arXiv cs.AI