SVF-CR: Synchronized Visual-Facial Cross-Refinement for Multimodal Ambivalence and Hesitancy Recognition

Abstract: Ambivalence and hesitancy are subtle behavioral states that are expressed through a combination of verbal content, facial behavior, visual context, and acoustic cues. Effective recognition therefore requires not only extracting informative unimodal representations, but also modeling how temporally aligned behavioral evidence interacts across modalities. In this paper, we propose a synchronized visual-facial cross-refinement framework (SVF-CR) with pairwise multimodal evidence fusion for ambivalence and hesitancy recognition. The proposed method first extracts whole-video segment tokens and cropped-face segment tokens using the same temporal partition. The synchronized visual and facial tokens are refined through intra-modal self-attention and bidirectional visual-facial cross-attention, allowing whole-video context and local facial behavior to mutually refine each other before evidence construction. We then construct segment-level visual-facial evidence using consistency and discrepancy modeling, followed by temporal self-attention and attention pooling. Textual and acoustic features are lightly refined through context self-attention and are fused with the enhanced visual-facial evidence at the final decision stage using pairwise evidence fusion. Experiments on the BAH (Behavioral Ambivalence/Hesitancy) public evaluation split show that the proposed synchronized visual-facial cross-refinement improves public macro-F1 over both global visual-face token fusion and synchronized evidence baselines, achieving a public macro-F1 of 0.7156. Code is available at : this https URL \_SVF-CR.
Submission history
Access Paper:
Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation


arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Research
All newsMedRealMM: A Real-World Multimodal Benchmark for Chinese Online Medical Consultation
arXiv:2607.09142v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in online medical consultation, yet existing benchmarks remain poorly aligned with real clinical practice. Many rely on synthetic conversations or patient simulators, omit pati…
Read at arXiv cs.AICogniConsole: Externalizing Inference-Time Control as a Formal Abstraction for Reliable LLM Interactions
arXiv:2607.08774v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliability in large language model (LLM) systems is typically framed as a function of model capability. We challenge this by demonstrating that reliability is significantly influenced by \emph{inference-time control} -- the comput…
Read at arXiv cs.AIA Formalization of the Mean-Field Derivation of the Vlasov Equation: AI-Assisted Lean Formalization as a Strategy Game
arXiv:2607.08986v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We formalize a research result in the Lean 4 proof assistant by having a mathematician direct an AI system, and frame the activity as a formalization game. The objective is to turn a LaTeX document into Lean. The game is won when t…
Read at arXiv cs.AIHow Does Bayesian Causal Discovery Fail? Characterising Structural Consequences in Linear Gaussian Networks under Latent Confounding
arXiv:2607.09449v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bayesian causal discovery is widely used for its ability to quantify epistemic uncertainty over directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) through posterior inference. However, its behaviour under latent confounding remains poorly understood,…
Read at arXiv cs.AI