OnePlus never had a chance in the US

Carriers and OnePlus were always incompatible.
If you buy something from a Verge link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.


Twelve years after the launch of the OnePlus One, OnePlus announced today that it has exited the United States. It’s bittersweet, as the brand has been on a comeback tour of sorts with its excellent OnePlus 15 and widely praised (though still too expensive) OnePlus Open .
The writing has been on the wall for a while now. T-Mobile stopped stocking OnePlus’ flagship phones after 2022, instead deciding to only carry its low-end Nord devices, and Verizon’s run with OnePlus only lasted two years, from 2020 through 2021. Even though it continued releasing flagships, OnePlus’ US footprint has been fading. In January, Android Headlines even claimed that the brand was being completely dismantled, though OnePlus denied that report.

This outcome didn’t seem inevitable. In 2014, when the OnePlus One arrived , nearly every tech enthusiast I knew was buying the phone. There was a cult-like enthusiasm for OnePlus that was hard to find elsewhere, and it used that community-driven approach to develop and grow a long-lasting, loyal fan base. For a while, it was practically impossible to call any other phone a “good deal” when a OnePlus phone also existed.
But most of the sales were online-only, directly from OnePlus. When it decided to officially launch through carriers in the US, it was probably doomed from the start.
OnePlus first launched on a US carrier in 2018, and according to T-Mobile, nearly 200,000 customers had already been using OnePlus phones on its network before it officially carried the devices. That’s far from Samsung or Apple numbers, which accounted for an estimated 90 percent of all phones sold at US carriers in 2020, but there was a case for T-Mobile trying to capture OnePlus’ growing enthusiast fan base.
What is the value of a $600 “flagship killer” versus a $1,200 flagship if there is no tangible price difference?
OnePlus grew its loyal fan base primarily through its “Never Settle” moniker, implying that you shouldn’t have to settle for inferior specs when you buy an affordable phone. It used the phrase “ Flagship killer ” to describe this ratio of price to performance, and fans ate it up. Especially in 2014, near the end of the “ 2-year phone contract era ,” people were begging for a device you could buy outright without being locked into a long and resentful relationship with your telecom.
But that’s just not how people buy phones in the US. Here, it’s all about carrier deals, and specifically, bill credits. The bill credit model gets a phone in your hand immediately, often with no upfront cost, and the price of the phone is diluted into your phone plan for 24 to 36 months. T-Mobile will give you a brand new 256GB iPhone 17 Pro today for just $4.16 a month on top of your phone plan. If you’re on AT&T, you can get that same phone for just $2.78 per month, as long as you trade in a phone and “upgrade to a qualifying unlimited plan.” And yes, that qualifying plan starts at $80 a month. If you switch carriers early, you’ll owe the remaining retail cost of the phone.
You can see why this might incentivize a carrier to focus on selling expensive flagships and not “affordable” flagship killers. Carriers want to offer you the idea of a deal, and if your new phone feels like it costs less than three bucks a month, that feels much better than paying $600 out of pocket, even if you’re paying much more than that over time.
What made OnePlus attractive was fundamentally in opposition to this model. What is the value of a $600 “flagship killer” versus a $1,200 flagship if there is no tangible price difference? The carriers need you to stay on their premium plans, and if they’ll only have $600 hanging over your head instead of $1,200, they have less incentive to carry these devices. Add to the fact that reportedly 75 percent of all smartphones sold at carrier stores are now iPhones , with Samsung making up another 15 percent or so , and there isn’t a whole lot of pie left to go around.
The main line that did well for OnePlus in the US is its ultra-affordable Nord series, claiming 428 percent growth for the company in the first half of 2021 . But after it lost its deal with T-Mobile in 2022, it was much harder for OnePlus to move volume. The US phone market is carrier dependent in almost every way, and without T-Mobile stores stocking the phones, it became hard for OnePlus to justify even selling the Nord here.
The ethos of OnePlus has always been about value for money. That is fundamentally at odds with the incentive system of the US phone market, which prioritizes trapping users in long-term relationships. OnePlus was already fighting for scraps here. OnePlus tried to kill the flagship, but in the end it was the flagships, sold by carriers, that killed OnePlus.
Clarification, July 16th: The first sentence of this post originally referred to OnePlus’s “eight-year run,” counting from its 2018 availability directly from T-Mobile; it now counts from the 2014 launch of the OnePlus One.
Verified source · The Verge
Reported by The Verge. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Funding
All news
FundingWhy are CD sales suddenly growing again?
CD sales are apparently going up, reportedly thanks to fans realizing they're an affordable way to support their favorite artists. According to a new report from research firm Luminate, 16.3 million CDs were sold in the first half of 2026 in the US, a 16 percent increase year-ov…
Read at The Verge
FundingGoogle is better at playing this game
Today, the European Union ordered Google to give its AI rivals greater access to Android, the open-source operating system that powers billions of devices worldwide. The demand is hardly surprising. It may look like a defeat on paper for Google, which has spent years resisting e…
Read at The Verge
FundingThe agent evaluation gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a reality-alignment problem, not a coverage problem — and most are shipping to production anyway
Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty full…
Read at VentureBeat
FundingHow a former DeepMind researcher raised at a $300M pre-seed valuation before launching a product
Drawing on more than a decade spent helping build some of the world's most influential AI systems, including research that later informed the development of ChatGPT, Andrew Dai explains why he believes visual AI is one of the next major frontiers in artificial intelligence.
Read at TechCrunch