Pebble founder Eric Migicovsky says his 30-day warranty is all about trust
Pebble is also ‘looking into’ offering parts for DIY repairs.
Pebble founder Eric Migicovsky says buyers of its new e-paper smartwatches should know what they’re signing up for and trust Pebble to make things right if they run into issues, despite the short warranty. “I think the most important thing is trust,” Migicovsky told me in an interview this week. “Do people trust the product that we’re making and do they trust the company and the people behind it?”
Migicovsky revived Pebble early last year, after the original company shut down in 2016. The new generation of Pebbles has the same aesthetic, but with updated tech, including larger e-paper displays. I was excited about Pebble’s return after missing out on the originals, but hesitated after noticing their 30-day warranty. That’s about as long as the Pebble Time 2’s battery life, so you might not even need to charge it before it’s no longer covered. While I ended up ordering a Pebble Round 2 that I’m still waiting for, others have also raised concerns about the watches’ warranty.
People have also reported running into hardware issues early on, like the front glass cracking on the Pebble Time 2. Earlier this week, Migicovsky addressed the issues in a blog post , saying Pebble has replaced 330 Time 2 watches for free so far, out of over 19,000 watches “in the field.”
Pebble’s blog says it will “continue replacing reasonable reports of glass cracking for free as long as we can. At some point, we will shift to offering a replacement at a highly discounted amount.” Additionally, Pebble is “looking into” offering replacement parts so people can do DIY repairs on their watches.
While Migicovsky hasn’t offered a timeline for when a shift might happen, he emphasized to The Verge that “an immensely small percentage” of watches have had this issue, adding, “It’s, for all intents and purposes, no skin off our back whatsoever to just offer straight up free replacements for anyone who has a problem.”
“At every step of the way we’ve communicated, over-communicated about what to expect [and] what the product’s going to be like.” Pebble warned customers in its announcement for the Pebble 2 Duo and Pebble Time 2 that they shouldn’t buy one if they need a “perfectly polished smartwatch,” noting that “Things could not last as long as you’d like.”
Verified source · The Verge
Reported by The Verge. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Research
All news
ResearchThe war on ‘woke science’ comes for space research
The Trump administration is waging a culture war on science, and the latest salvo is in the form of a dry, bureaucratic proposal from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that could threaten the future of US science as we know it. The proposal would give political appointee…
Read at The VergeHG-RAG: Hierarchy-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Structured Knowledge Graphs
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has proven to be a widely successful process at improving the quality of outputs from a Large Language Model (LLM) for wider context. However, RAG systems typically retrieve context from flat document stores, which struggles when queries require hierarchical or relational reasoning across structured knowledge. I present HG-RAG (Hierarchy-Guided RAG), a framework that performs graph-traversal over a hierarchical knowledge graph to deliver structured context to a language model. My retrieval pipeline resolves a named entity anchor from the query, then expand…
Read at arXiv cs.AIIntelligent Three Level Learning Architecture for Autonomous UAV Swarms in Search and Rescue
This paper presents a novel three level hierarchical learning architecture for autonomous UAV swarms performing search and rescue operations. Unlike conventional approaches that apply a single learning paradigm across all hierarchy levels, the proposed architecture integrates three qualitatively different learning mechanisms corresponding to the biological hierarchy of reflexes, skills, and reasoning such as Hebbian neuroplasticity for individual agent adaptation, multi agent reinforcement learning with graph neural networks and behavior trees for tactical coordination, and model agnostic met…
Read at arXiv cs.AIIMEX Interaction-Based Model Explanation
In predictive modeling, the ability to explain why a model produces a given target prediction has become increasingly important [5, 10]. Black-box models do not provide a transparent description of the internal mechanisms that generate the prediction, making even accurate predictions difficult to interpret and validate. In critical contexts, predictive accuracy alone is not a sufficient validation metric if the reasons underlying model decisions remain unexplained. The IMEX (Interaction-Based Model Explanation) approach represents a methodological direction within explainable predictive model…
Read at arXiv cs.AI