Generative Ontology Induction: Domain-Agnostic Schema Discovery from Document Corpora Using Large Language Models
Abstract: Ontology engineering remains a critical bottleneck in knowledge-intensive AI systems. Existing automated approaches either depend on predefined schemas, operate within narrow domains, or produce unstructured outputs unsuitable for downstream pipelines. We introduce Generative Ontology Induction (GOI), a domain-agnostic framework that induces a generative blueprint - entities, dimensions, properties, relationships, and constraints - from a corpus of examples and exports it as a typed graph (six node types, seven edge types) in YAML/JSON. We introduce the Node Coverage Score, a novel evaluation metric that measures the fraction of structural ontology nodes (classes, properties, and dimensions) appearing in generated outputs. A controlled generative validation on four contrasting ontologies - a familiar Software Services Invoice schema, a custom Job Description Ontology, a confidential Pain-Management Clinical Visit Record Ontology, and a Professional Services Contract & Statement of Work Ontology - shows that GOI-prompted generation covers 95-100% of the structural backbone in every case; a generic three-field template holds at 97.8% on the invoice schema but drops to 52.2% on the Job Description Ontology, 62.2% on the Pain-Management ontology, and 78.3% on the Professional Services Contract ontology. The structural coverage holds regardless of how familiar the document type is to the model.
Submission history
Access Paper:
Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Research
All news
ResearchNearly every Kindle is steeply discounted at Best Buy
If you’ve been thinking about picking up a Kindle before school starts, or for your next vacation, now’s a good time to do it. As part of its Black Friday in July sale, Best Buy has brought the Kindle Paperwhite back down to its all-time low of $124.99 ($35 off). It’s the Kindle…
Read at The VergeIt Takes 8 Tokens: Weak-to-Strong Off-Policy RL via Auxiliary Branches
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has emerged as a standard approach for enhancing reasoning in large language models, which typically optimizes the policy by contrasting multiple self generated rollouts. However, we identify a critical support limited bottleneck in this paradigm: on challenging reasoning tasks, the target model's samples often exhibit semantic redundancy, converging into the same erroneous "reasoning basins" that offer negligible reward contrast for policy updates. In this paper, we propose to overcome this limitation through a weak to strong learning paradigm,…
Read at arXiv cs.AIA Survey on GNN-based Link Prediction: Techniques, Applications, and Challenges
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as the leading paradigm for link prediction, enabling the inference of missing connections and the anticipation of potential future links. However, existing reviews lack systematic exploration specifically targeting underlying GNN architectures and diverse graph structures. To address this critical gap, this paper provides a comprehensive review of GNN-based link prediction from a novel and dedicated GNN perspective. We propose an innovative taxonomy that categorizes recent advancements based on techniques and applications. From a technique perspectiv…
Read at arXiv cs.AIPlanFlip: Attacking Multi-Agent LLM Systems via Planning-Phase Prompt Injection
Multi-agent LLM systems increasingly rely on a Planner to decompose goals into sub-task sequences that downstream Executor and Critic agents execute and audit. We identify the planning phase as a critical attack surface: a single injection into the Planner's context achieves cascade amplification, corrupting all downstream sub-tasks simultaneously. We introduce PlanFlip, a framework comprising four planning-phase prompt injection attacks -- GoalSubstitution (PF-1), PriorityInversion (PF-2), ContextPollution (PF-3), and RoleConfusion (PF-4) -- each disguised as plausible tool outputs to evade…
Read at arXiv cs.AI