Meta won’t have to face the next planned social media addiction trial

After settling with other social media companies, the plaintiff dropped his case.


Less than a week before Meta’s lawyers were set to return to a Los Angeles courtroom , the plaintiff accusing the platform of inflicting harm dropped the case. Brought by 15-year-old Florida plaintiff going by initials R.K.C., the case was set to be the second in a set of bellwether trials meant to test legal arguments that social media giants allegedly broke the law by creating features that hooked and harmed teens.
TikTok, Snap, and YouTube previously settled claims brought by R.K.C. for undisclosed amounts. “In light of the overall successful result of the litigation and his concerns about enduring a grueling weekslong trial, he has elected to withdraw his claims against Meta,” R.K.C.’s lawyers Emily Jeffcott and Rahul Ravipudi said in a statement. “He’s ready to close this chapter and focus on his recovery and engage in therapy as he aspires to have a normal life.” That means Meta got out of this case without having to pay a settlement. “The claims never held up, and this outcome makes clear that we will not back away from defending ourselves against baseless lawsuits,” Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said in a statement.
Meta got out of this case without having to pay a settlement
Multiple cases have already begun to test claims about social media companies allegedly misleading users about the safety of their products and inflicting harm. Meta and Google’s YouTube lost the first bellwether case tried at the courthouse, with a jury finding them to be negligent and ordering them to pay a total of $6 million in compensatory and punitive damages to the single plaintiff. Separately, a New Mexico jury ordered the company to pay a $375 million penalty , and the state is preparing for the next phase of trial seeking structural business changes .
There’s still seven more bellwether cases on deck in the California state courthouse in LA, and a separate set of cases pending in a federal court in Oakland. Meta, Tiktok, Snap, and YouTube settled with a school district that was set to be the first in that separate set of bellwether cases seeking money to cover mental health-related costs to students allegedly caused by their platforms. Meta is still set to face claims brought by state attorneys general in federal court next month, alleging that it illegally misled the public about harmful and allegedly addictive features.
Verified source · The Verge
Reported by The Verge. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Policy
All news
PolicyNCLT Stays BYJU’S Insolvency Bidding Process Till August 31
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has stayed the insolvency bidding process of embattled edtech startup BYJU’S parent Think &…
Read at Inc42
PolicyLawmakers prepare bill requiring AI ‘kill switch’
Lawmakers are preparing to introduce an "AI Kill Switch Act" that would require AI companies to shut down or throttle their systems on orders from the Department of Homeland Security, according to a report from Politico. Reps. Ted Lieu (D-CA) and Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) are expec…
Read at The Verge
PolicyApple’s OpenAI lawsuit is about who gets to define the post-smartphone era
Today on Decoder, I’m talking with Hayden Field, The Verge’s senior AI reporter, about the major trade secrets lawsuit between Apple and OpenAI and what this tells us about OpenAI’s future. By now I’m sure most Decoder listeners are familiar with Apple’s allegations in this case…
Read at The Verge
PolicyGarmin’s new screen-free fitness tracker doesn’t require a subscription
Garmin announced a new smart band today designed to track "advanced fitness and wellness features" without a screen to eliminate distractions and push its battery life to up to 10 days between charges. Similar to competing products like the Whoop 5.0 and Google's recently announ…
Read at The Verge