Empowering Cross-Domain Sequential Recommendation with Hybrid Tokenization and Serial-Parallel Decoding
Abstract: Cross-domain sequential recommendation (CDSR) aims to model users' dynamic interest transitions and sequential patterns across multiple domains. Recently, generative recommendation (GR) has emerged. It first learns semantic identifiers (SIDs) from item semantics and formulates recommendation as autoregressive generation. However, existing methods face two critical issues: (1) they ignore collaborative correlations across domains during tokenization, and (2) they adopt inefficient decoding strategies, such as beam search, during generation, which hinders real-time deployment. To address these limitations, we propose GenCDSR, an effective and efficient generative framework for CDSR. Specifically, we design a cross-domain hybrid tokenization mechanism with a multi-tower architecture to jointly capture cross-domain commonalities and domain-specific distinctions through hierarchical shared-specific and fine-grained codebooks. Furthermore, we develop a cross-domain serial-parallel decoding strategy that leverages the hierarchical SID structure to partially parallelize generation, significantly reducing inference latency while preserving generation consistency. Experiments on three public datasets show that GenCDSR achieves an average accuracy improvement of 1.5 percent and an average inference latency reduction of 85.1 percent compared with state-of-the-art baselines. The implementation code and datasets are available online: this https URL .
Submission history
Access Paper:
Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Research
All newsThinkReset: Learnable Intermediate Interface Construction for Bounded-Context Long-Horizon Reasoning
Long chain-of-thought reasoning improves performance on complex problems, but it also introduces redundancy accumulation, context overflow, and error anchoring. We argue that under bounded context windows, the core bottleneck is not trajectory compression or test-time control, but the absence of a reusable intermediate interface that can replace discarded history and support continued solving. We further identify a key failure mode of outcome-reward-driven long-chain reinforcement learning: when the model has not solved the task before the window is nearly exhausted, the final-answer reward e…
Read at arXiv cs.AIOpenClaw and Ollama in Agentic AI: Toward Fully Autonomous and Scalable AI Agent Systems
The rapid transition from reactive large language models (LLMs) to persistent, action-capable systems has exposed critical gaps in the architectural understanding of Agentic AI, particularly in separating inference, orchestration, and execution layers for autonomous AI agents. Despite recent advances, unified frameworks for designing and evaluating full-stack agentic systems remain limited. This paper presents a comprehensive, layered architecture for Agentic AI, outlining the evolution from reactive LLM interfaces to persistent, goal-driven autonomous AI agents with memory, planning, and con…
Read at arXiv cs.AICan AI Evaluate AI Scientists? A Benchmarking Study of Autonomous Research Generation Systems Using Automated Multi-Model Review
AI Scientist systems capable of autonomous research have the potential to significantly accelerate scientific discovery. However, evaluating and comparing the quality of AI-generated papers remains an open challenge. We propose and implement a rigorous benchmarking protocol using an automated peer-review system that harnesses frontier large language models to assess scientific papers across four core dimensions: originality, scientific rigor, clarity, and significance. We evaluate four leading AI Scientist frameworks: \textit{Sakana AI (v1 & v2)}, \textit{CycleResearcher}, and \textit{Data-to…
Read at arXiv cs.AITAPR: Enhancing LLM Performance with a Task-Aware Prompt Rewriter
Large Language Models (LLMs) often require carefully crafted prompts to unlock their full potential, which can be a barrier for non-expert users. This work addresses the challenge by introducing a Task-Aware Prompt Rewriter (TAPR), a model that reformulates user prompts into task-optimized prompts with the explicit goal of improving downstream LLM performance. We train TAPR using reinforcement learning with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), where rewards are derived from LLM-as-judge evaluations of both the reformulated prompt and the corresponding task output. Experimental results o…
Read at arXiv cs.AI