Anime reaction YouTubers are at war with copyright enforcers
By Charles Pulliam-Moorevia The Verge• 8 min read•September 11, 2026
Photograph via The Verge
Content creators say their videos are fair use, but one controversial company begs to differ.
On September 6th, YouTuber Nicholas Light posted a video to one of his channels that made it seem like all of his content was about to be removed from the platform. In the video — ominously titled “ My Channel will be Deleted Today ” — Light alleges that he was on the receiving end of some of the “thousands upon thousands of false copyright strikes” recently initiated by a company called Remove Your Media. Light spends much of the 13-minute video accusing Remove Your Media CEO Eric Green of being a troll who systematically targets creators whose content mentions or features clips of popular anime series like Bleach and One Piece.
When I recently spoke with Light via email, he told me that over 60 of his videos had been temporarily taken down after he was hit with over a dozen copyright strikes stemming from Remove Your Media’s Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown requests. Light said that “having a video taken down or struck is almost second nature” for people running reaction channels. But he insisted that the way Remove Your Media has been going after creators is abusive and unrelated to any legitimate interest in protecting copyrighted IP.
“I think [Remove Your Media is] trying to get the attention of these companies, to hopefully get hired by them,” Light said. “But because they’re so sloppy, they’re damaging themselves. With all the major channels covering this, they’re doomed.”
While it’s easy to get the sense that Light might have been playing up some of this drama for viewers’ attention, it is clear that a number of other content creators have similarly been hit with an inordinate amount of copyright strikes. Many of these creators specialize in anime and gaming reaction videos that feature blurred-out or otherwise altered pieces of copyrighted footage. The creators superimpose the altered copyrighted footage (like anime opening sequences or full episodes ) onto videos of themselves reacting to and/or commenting on it.
Though these types of videos are kind of like an inverse Mystery Science Theater 3000 where the on-camera creators are meant to be the focus, viewers can also use them as a (less-than-ideal) way to watch copyrighted material without having to pay for it. The creators insist that their content is fundamentally transformative and protected by fair use, but that has not kept YouTube from sending them warnings about their accounts potentially being erased.
Verified source · The Verge
Reported by The Verge. Open the original for full media and formatting.
New Mexico's Supreme Court is punishing a lawyer for including AI-fabricated witnesses and fake police testimony in an appeal for his client's murder conviction, according to a report from Reuters. In a filing on Wednesday, the court fined Stephen Aarons $5,000 and held him in c…
Microsoft agreed to a set of safety and privacy principles for AI in schools a week after two major school systems announced a ban on student-facing AI. In a new agreement with the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the second-largest teachers union in the US, and its New Yo…
Remove Your Media feels it does not need to extensively review all of a creator’s videos to file DMCA takedowns in good faith
Remove Your Media legal representative Evan F. Stone told me that Viz Media and Crunchyroll are two of the company’s “biggest anime clients.” Stone explained that Remove Your Media “reports thousands of allegedly infringing links every day” — some of which are “forwarded by the copyright owners themselves,” while others are discovered through online searches. Stone also noted that some clients are “very lenient” with certain types of content, despite their weak fair use defense. But he was adamant that the content being produced by YouTubers Remove Your Media has gone after is not transformative enough to fall under fair use.
“Commentary, in this context, does not make the use transformative: these videos show the copyrighted work in its entirety, and a great deal of this content sits behind a paywall,” Stone said. “Add the fact that some viewers are watching these versions rather than the licensed versions, and the effect on the marketplace is real.”
“For any particular video a creator believes was noticed in error, the counter-notice exists for exactly that situation, and it works,” Stone said. “What [Remove Your Media] is seeing instead is channels countering every single video, full episode uploads included, swearing under penalty of perjury that each one was removed by mistake.”
From Light’s perspective, channels like his are producing a unique kind of entertainment that also benefits copyright holders. “It’s free promotion for them at the end of the day,” he explains. Reaction videos of all genres have been popular on the internet for years, and it’s clear from view counts on YouTube that anime fans in particular are watching this kind of content.
Light feels that because “the [anime industry] doesn’t do the best job promoting their works outside of Japan,” he and his peers have been picking up the advertising slack with their videos. And while Remove Your Media says that it works on behalf of certain anime distribution platforms including Crunchyroll and Viz Media, Light believes that “no company in the industry would want to align with a company so sloppy.” Crunchyroll did not respond to The Verge ’s questions about whether it has hired Remove Your Media to enforce copyright and Viz Media would not comment on record.
The Jacksons did not respond to The Verge ’s ask for comment about whether that unnamed individual might be Eric Green or Remove Your Media and how they were able to avoid having their channel deleted on the date (September 6th) listed in their first video addressing the situation. On September 9th, the YouTubers said that their account was now scheduled to be deleted the following day, and they described YouTube’s approach to enforcing copyright as a broken system that allows for AI-powered mass reporting. By September 10th, the Rice & Ginger YouTube channel was still online, and the Jacksons were back with a new video thanking Light for speaking out on their behalf and “saving” their channel.
When I reached out to YouTube asking how it handles DMCA takedown disputes between reaction video creators and IP rightsholders, policy communications manager Jack Malon said that the company “does not decide who owns the rights to content.” Rather than mediating the legality of who owns the copyrighted content and whether a creator’s videos fall under fair use, YouTube brings the two parties together and leaves it to them to work the matter out between themselves.
“When we receive valid legal requests, we remove the content to comply with copyright law,” Malon said. “If uploaders believe they have the right to use the material, including for exceptions like fair use, they can file a counter notification.”
Malon added that YouTube only removes creators’ videos “when a rightsholder submits a valid and legal takedown request” because the company has to comply with copyright law. According to YouTube , creators can solve copyright strikes by submitting counter notifications — a process that involves providing evidence of ownership or permission to use all elements featured in the removed content. In response to my questions about how Remove Your Media selected the creators that were affected by the takedowns, he said that the company prioritized going after YouTube channels that generate “feeder traffic for paywalled copies of episodes nobody licensed to them.”
“For any particular video a creator believes was noticed in error, the counter-notice exists for exactly that situation, and it works,” Stone said. “What [Remove Your Media] is seeing instead is channels countering every single video, full episode uploads included, swearing under penalty of perjury that each one was removed by mistake.”
This drama highlights how certain dynamics of the creator economy may be changing
Malon told me that, after a creator submits counter notifications, their videos can be restored and the strikes on their accounts can be resolved “if the rightsholder does not respond with proof of legal action to restrain the allegedly infringing content.” But it’s not entirely clear how YouTube confirms the validity of a claimant’s purported ownership of removed content.
On September 10th, Light returned to his channel with another video lambasting both Remove Your Media and YouTube for the way the companies have gone about initiating and handling DMCA disputes. Light said that the Jacksons’ videos will be restored within 10 business days as a result of “all of the noise that [we] made together,” and he addressed people who have speculated that he might be leaning into this drama for financial gain.
“It’s funny to me I start having problems with my AdSense the 10 days I choose to go after YouTube,” Light said, explaining that his videos have been demonetized during the DMCA fight. “Really makes you think. So maybe we should shut the fuck up when we say stupid shit like ‘he’s banking on the situation. He’s only doing this for money.’”
Though Light and others who have spoken out about the way YouTube handles copyright issues might not be trying to capitalize on being deplatformed, this drama has highlighted how certain dynamics of the content creator economy may be changing. Anime reaction videos probably aren’t going away anytime soon, but it does seem like studios and distributors are becoming more aggressive about monitoring how their IP is being repurposed online. And while creators of all kinds still rely on fair use to produce the content that pays their bills, they may need to tread much more carefully if they want to avoid getting caught up in an aggressive purge.
Policy
Policy
Policy
Policy