Agentic Neural Architecture Search

Abstract: Neural architecture search (NAS) methods have grown increasingly efficient, yet they remain bounded by manually engineered search spaces that require substantial domain expertise and must be rebuilt for every new task. Large language models (LLMs) can generate architectures in an open-ended space, but how to optimally divide the labor between LLM-driven design and NAS-driven search remains unexplored. We propose a mechanism that bridges these two paradigms: an LLM produces a high-quality seed architecture, then decomposes it into a "slotted architecture", a scaffold with named, interchangeable module slots that automatically defines a bounded, task-specific search space for conventional NAS to explore, without manual engineering. We instantiate this mechanism in AgentNAS, a modular three-phase pipeline in which each component's contribution can be measured independently. On 17 tasks spanning classification, dense regression, segmentation, and multi-label tagging across diverse modalities (NAS-Bench-360 and Unseen NAS), AgentNAS establishes a new state of the art on 11 tasks, outperforming published baselines including task-specific expert designs. Ablation studies show that the two search mechanisms are broadly complementary: the LLM-generated seed already surpasses published baselines on the majority of tasks, and NAS delivers additional gains in most cases through combinatorial recombination across slots, a mode of search that independent LLM samples cannot replicate. These patterns hold across three LLMs of different capability levels, confirming that the division of labor is robust. Our code is available at this https URL .
Submission history
Access Paper:
Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation


arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Agents
All newsOmniFood-Bench: Evaluating VLMs for Nutrient Reasoning and Personalized Health Advice
arXiv:2607.08423v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid integration of Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) into critical infrastructure promises to revolutionize personalized healthcare and dietary management. However, in the domain of food systems, autonomous agents face a un…
Read at arXiv cs.AIFormal Mechanisms for Market Stability in Self-Interested Agent Societies: A Marketplace Simulation Study
arXiv:2607.08652v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-interested agents, left unconstrained, tend toward defection in repeated social dilemmas, causing cooperative gains from trade to collapse. This paper investigates what formal mechanisms, layered on top of unrestricted communi…
Read at arXiv cs.AICausalDS: Benchmarking Causal Reasoning in Data-Science Agents
arXiv:2607.08093v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as integrated data-science agents, combining abstract reasoning with advanced tool use. Yet the relevant benchmark landscape largely divides into symbolic causal reasoning benchmarks wi…
Read at arXiv cs.AIRemember When It Matters: Proactive Memory Agent for Long-Horizon Agents
arXiv:2607.08716v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In long-horizon tasks, decision-relevant state is often scattered across an expanding trajectory, while the action agent must surface it and act. As trajectories grow, task requirements, environment facts, prior attempts, diagnoses…
Read at arXiv cs.AI