Multimodal Unlearning Across Vision, Language, Video, and Audio: Survey of Methods, Datasets, and Benchmarks

Abstract: With the growing adoption of VLMs, DMs, LLMs, and AFMs, these multimodal foundation models can inadvertently encode sensitive, copyrighted, biased, or unsafe cross-modal associations that originate from their training data. Retraining after deletion requests or policy updates is often impractical, and targeted forgetting remains difficult because knowledge is distributed across shared representations. Multimodal unlearning addresses this challenge by enabling selective removal across modalities while retaining overall utility. This survey offers a unified, system-oriented view of multimodal unlearning across vision, language, audio, and video, grounded in recent advances, emerging applications, and open problems. Our taxonomy enables systematic comparison across model architectures and modalities, clarifying trade-offs among deletion strength, retention, efficiency, reversibility, and robustness. This survey highlights open problems and practical considerations to support future research and deployment of multimodal unlearning. We release a curated repository: this https URL
Submission history
Access Paper:

Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation


arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Policy
All newsWhen Synthetic Speech Is All You Have: Better Call GRPO
arXiv:2607.08409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based ASR adapted to regulated domains such as banking is bottlenecked by privacy: real speech is costly and legally constrained to collect, making synthetic text-to-speech (TTS) an attractive substitute. Yet synthetic speech…
Read at arXiv cs.AIEfficient Safety Alignment of Language Models via Latent Personality Traits
arXiv:2607.07918v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current safety methods for large language models are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, motivating research into robust alternatives. Latent Adversarial Training (LAT) is among the most effective defenses, but can deg…
Read at arXiv cs.AIWho Analyses the Analyser? Self-Validating LLM Hazard Analysis with Constitutional Meta-STPA
arXiv:2607.08054v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly trusted to draft the artifacts of safety analysis such as, losses, hazards, Unsafe Control Actions (UCAs), and safety constraints, inside rigorous processes such as Systems-Theoretic…
Read at arXiv cs.AIUltraX: Refining Pre-Training Data at Scale with Adaptive Programmatic Editing
arXiv:2607.08646v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As available training data approaches its physical limit, gains from Scaling Laws have begun to diminish. Consequently, improving Large Language Models (LLMs) now depends less on data expansion and more on higher-quality data uti…
Read at arXiv cs.AI