ARC-Bench: Closed-Loop Replanning Masks Broken Action Ranking in Frozen JEPA World Models
Abstract: Reward-free latent world models plan by scoring candidate actions with distances in a frozen latent space: an action is preferred if its predicted future embedding lands closer to the goal embedding. This silently assumes that latent closeness is action-rankable, i.e., that ordering candidates by latent distance agrees with ordering them by true cost. We audit this assumption directly. We introduce ARC-Bench, a no-leak, fixed-candidate protocol that measures whether frozen JEPA-style objectives rank candidate actions correctly, and apply it to official released JEPA-WM checkpoints across navigation and manipulation-style control. The assumption fails, severely and structurally: on the official manipulation audits the top-scored candidate is almost always suboptimal, and the same inversion appears in the maze domains. A controlled visual-backbone extension shows that the defect persists when DINOv2 is replaced by video-pretrained V-JEPA 1 and V-JEPA 2 encoders at ViT-L/ViT-G scale. Provenance, undertraining, matched-budget backbone controls, and metric-circularity controls rule out trivial explanations. We then explain why this defect has stayed invisible: closed-loop replanning masks it. When we reduce the planner's replanning frequency, success collapses in both a navigation and a manipulation domain, and the episodes rescued by frequent replanning are enriched for severe first-plan ranking failures in the PointMaze first-plan diagnostic. Closed-loop success rates therefore systematically overstate the rankability of frozen latent representations. ARC-Bench supplies the measurement, and the masking mechanism the explanation, for methods that adapt, amortize, or replan around latent-space planners without directly auditing released JEPA-WM action rankability.
Submission history
Access Paper:
Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Research
All newsWhen Does Memory Help? A Cost-Aware Evaluation of Long-Term Memory in Tool-Using LLM Agents
Long-term memory for LLM agents is evaluated today by conversational recall benchmarks (LoCoMo, LongMemEval), which measure question answering over dialogue history, not whether remembered facts change what a tool-using agent does. We present MERIT (Memory Evaluation for Realistic Instrumented Tasks), a benchmark and harness that measures the marginal utility of memory for task-executing agents under explicit cost accounting. MERIT provides episodic tool-use tasks in three domains whose dependence on earlier-episode facts is verified by an automated leak check; a difficulty ladder ending in u…
Read at arXiv cs.AIBeyond Right and Wrong: Evaluating Second-order Social Reasoning in Large Language Models
Previous AI alignment efforts have focused primarily on first-order social norms -- teaching models what is socially acceptable or unacceptable (e.g., `do not steal'). However, social intelligence depends not only on norm recognition, but also on anticipating who will enforce it and how (e.g., public shame or even imprisonment). These second-order expectations, known as metanorms, govern how people respond when social rules are broken. We introduce a novel framework for evaluating metanorm reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) along two dimensions: emotional appraisal and behavioral respo…
Read at arXiv cs.AICriticGen: Generation-Aware Evaluation as Actionable Feedback
Current evaluation methods for large language models are coarse-grained and decoupled from generation, producing generic explanations that fail to provide actionable feedback for model improvement. We propose CriticGen, a fine-grained, generation-aware evaluation framework that turns evaluation into actionable control for answer improvement. CriticGen first generates sample-specific evaluation dimensions and scoring criteria under high-level categories such as subjective, objective, and self-derived constraints. These criteria then serve as a dynamic rubric for jointly producing a score, a re…
Read at arXiv cs.AIRAPID: Reliability-Aware Pair Importance Distillation
Inter example relational distillation transfers a teacher's representation geometry by matching relations among examples within a mini batch. Computing all pairs has quadratic complexity in the batch size, whereas uniform subsampling may use a limited relation budget inefficiently. We introduce Reliability Aware Pair Importance Distillation, or RAPID, which separates a reliability gated relational target from a full support adaptive pair proposal. Reliability determines which teacher relations are emphasized, while calibrated teacher entropy and detached student-teacher residuals determine wh…
Read at arXiv cs.AI