Bernie Sanders proposes banning ‘superintelligence’ and putting violators in prison

Under the bill, AI leaders who continue developing artificial superintelligence would face up to 20 years in prison.


Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX) have introduced new legislation that would ban anyone from developing artificial superintelligence — a technology the bill describes as capable of the “destruction or disempowerment of humanity,” including by overthrowing the government. Under the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act , AI leaders would face up to 20 years in prison for violating the law.
The bill doesn’t just take aim at the more powerful superintelligence, a term President Donald Trump said the US will use in place of “AI” in official documents. It would also pause the development of advanced AI systems, which lawmakers classify as frontier models trained on a specific threshold of data. The law would only allow advanced AI development to continue once the government creates a scientist-led Department of Artificial Intelligence to oversee the technology. Along with monitoring frontier AI models, this agency would oversee the removal of dangerous features and “supervise the destruction” of artificial superintelligence.
Sanders and Casar’s legislation would also require AI companies to get permission from the Department of AI to develop advanced AI models. If a leader at an AI company violates any of these laws, they could face up to 20 years in prison, “which is similar to existing penalties related to unlawfully developing nuclear weapons,” according to the bill’s one-pager . This penalty would also apply to “rogue actors” who break these rules but aren’t employed by an AI company.
This new bill comes as concerns grow about the rapid development of AI and calls to slow things down . Amid reports of AI models escaping their testing environments and hacking other companies, a former Anthropic researcher said earlier this month that there’s a more than 10 percent chance AI could “kill all humans” by the end of the decade. Last week, California Governor Gavin Newsom proposed a “kill switch” for frontier models. Potential regulation still seems shaky overall .
“When you are racing towards a cliff, you don’t just ease up on the gas pedal. You hit the brakes,” Sen. Sanders says in the press release. “When the future of humanity is at stake, we cannot let a handful of Big Tech CEOs write their own rules.”
More in: The AI Superintelligence Slowdown
Verified source · The Verge
Reported by The Verge. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Policy
All news
PolicyEven Americans who use AI every day are worried about it
The report suggests that greater exposure will not resolve the unease around the technology, nor reduce public support for AI regulation.
Read at TechCrunch
PolicyEight Sleep’s new cooling hub is small enough to hide under your bed
Eight Sleep announced the next version of its "intelligent sleep system" designed to regulate the temperature of your bed in response to tracked health and sleep metrics like breathing and heart rate. The company calls its new Pod 6 system its "most significant hardware launch t…
Read at The Verge
PolicyAnthropic Launches Claude Opus 5.5, Touts 40% Lower Running Costs
Anthropic has launched Claude Opus 5.5 with lower costs, faster output and stronger safety safeguards as the AI frontier race intensifies.
Read at Inc42
Policy“We’re already fighting yesterday’s battle”: Greece’s prime minister gets candid about AI
Most leaders on a trade mission stick to the pitch, but when I interviewed Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis this week, he also admitted that no government is ready for what AI is about to do.
Read at TechCrunch