A Gold-Standard Study of What Makes a Lightweight Game-Playing Agent Strong

Abstract: Reinforcement learning agents for imperfect-information card games are only as strong as the opponents they train against, and they are hard to grade, since they beat a random opponent over 99 percent of the time and only tie copies of themselves. So we build a strong, fixed, rule-based expert for Gin Rummy and use it only as a yardstick, never for training. It beats every agent we trained 70 to 99 percent of the time. Across more than a hundred runs, we isolate what makes a lightweight agent stronger. Trust region updates, a well-aimed reward, a curriculum of tougher opponents, warm starting, and keeping the best checkpoint all help, and stacking them lifts a self-play champion from about 30 to 36 percent against the expert. Several ideas did not pay off. Short-term and longer-term reward shaping, learned state embeddings, imitation and DAgger, and a live large language model opponent were each unhelpful, too slow, or too heavy to train at scale. Comparing MLP, convolutional, set-based, attention, and recurrent encoders shows that extra capacity does little to break the ceiling, suggesting the limit is information rather than network size. We add standard baselines (neural fictitious self-play and information set Monte Carlo search) and confirm the approach carries over to Leduc Hold'em, where the optimum is computable. The result is a lightweight, game-agnostic recipe that trains competitive agents without training on the expert, for any game a small model can handle, reported with robust statistics and released as a reusable package.
Submission history
Access Paper:
Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation


arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Agents
All news
AgentsICE is threatening to deport witnesses of its latest shooting
Advocates are demanding that the Department of Homeland Security release bodycam footage of the fatal shooting of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, a Mexican immigrant who was killed by ICE officers in Houston during a traffic stop earlier this week. But DHS claims the agents involved in…
Read at The VergeAgentic Neural Architecture Search
arXiv:2607.07984v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural architecture search (NAS) methods have grown increasingly efficient, yet they remain bounded by manually engineered search spaces that require substantial domain expertise and must be rebuilt for every new task. Large langua…
Read at arXiv cs.AIFeedback Manipulation Regularization: Enabling Offline Agent Alignment for Imitation Learning
arXiv:2607.07859v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) research has increasingly shifted focus towards alignment, ensuring agents learn behaviors adhering to human values. While human demonstrations and feedback have proven crucial for alignment, existing ap…
Read at arXiv cs.AICausalDS: Benchmarking Causal Reasoning in Data-Science Agents
arXiv:2607.08093v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as integrated data-science agents, combining abstract reasoning with advanced tool use. Yet the relevant benchmark landscape largely divides into symbolic causal reasoning benchmarks wi…
Read at arXiv cs.AI