Different Teachers, Different Capabilities: Sub-1B On-Device Distillation for Structured Text Enrichment

Abstract: High-volume structured extraction pays a large model's latency on every item, so distilling the task into a small on-device model is attractive: comparable output at a fraction of the time and cost. We measure what that distillation actually delivers, per sub-task. Each news article is mapped to one JSON object with a short summary and five categorical labels. We distill an 8B reasoning teacher (deepseek-r1:8b) into a 0.6B student (Qwen3-0.6B; QLoRA, three seeds), and add two teacher controls: a same-size non-reasoning teacher and a larger managed pipeline. A blinded, reference-free, three-judge panel scores every arm against the full article, alongside two non-distillation baselines, few-shot prompting and constrained decoding. The student runs at about 0.8 s per article against the teacher's 39 s, and recovers 58% of the base-to-teacher gap on summary quality, beating its primary baseline (constrained decoding) by +16.8 points and few-shot prompting by a secondary +4.9. A same-size non-reasoning teacher trains a student no better than the untuned base, so the summary gain follows from the teacher's reasoning nature rather than its scale. Capabilities then split by teacher: the reasoning teacher transfers writing quality and the managed pipeline transfers label diversity, while a same-size instruction teacher's students stay more grounded on the 22 short, thin-source articles in the 93-item test set (74 versus 55 faithful), where the reasoning-lineage student fabricates. That grounding difference is a consistent ordering rather than a significant aggregate effect, and the subgroup is small, so we report it as a direction. Because no single engine wins every field, the deliverable is a per-field routing map for on-device enrichment.
Submission history
Access Paper:
Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation


arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Research
All newsPolyUQuest: Verifiable Structure-Aware Web RAG over Heterogeneous Graphs
arXiv:2607.08269v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems treat web pages as flat text, losing the structural and semantic signals encoded in HTML. We present PolyUQuest, a verifiable, structure-aware web RAG framework built on a heter…
Read at arXiv cs.AIUsing AI-based Learning Assistants in Higher Education: A Large-Scale Descriptive Analysis
arXiv:2607.08748v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this study, we present a large-scale descriptive analysis of the use of an AI-based learning assistant (Syntea) in higher education. Based on objective log data from 77,543 students enrolled in distance studies, we examine usage…
Read at arXiv cs.AIMentalHospital: A Virtual Environment for Evaluating Psychiatric Clinical Encounters
arXiv:2607.08257v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on isolated psychiatric tasks, including dialogue, diagnosis, and treatment planning, yet existing benchmarks rarely simulate complete psychiatric clinical encounters. We i…
Read at arXiv cs.AIIdeas Have Genomes: Benchmarking Scientific Lineage Reasoning and Lineage-Grounded Idea Generation
arXiv:2607.08758v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific ideas rarely start from a blank page. They inherit mechanisms, repair known limitations, and recombine pieces of earlier work, much like biological genomes. Current benchmarks still say little about whether AI systems ca…
Read at arXiv cs.AI