AI-guided stimuli discovery and generation to optimize facial emotion perception studies in autism

Abstract: Understanding perceptual differences between autistic and neurotypical adults requires behavioral assays that are sensitive, reliable, and mechanistically informative. Facial emotion perception is a useful test case because group differences have been reported, but findings vary across studies. Here we show that this variability may reflect image-level sparsity: autistic-neurotypical differences in emotion judgments were concentrated in a small subset of diagnostic facial expressions rather than spread uniformly across stimuli. We trained population-specific artificial neural network models to predict image-level judgments for autistic and neurotypical participants, then used these models to select novel faces predicted to maximize group separation. In an independent cohort, model-selected images produced larger behavioral differences than matched random images. We then used the same models with a generative adversarial network to transform diagnostic images toward greater predicted group agreement. In phenotype-matched validation, synthesized images reduced behavioral separation relative to their matched originals. These results establish a model-guided framework for discovering and transforming stimuli that reveal population-specific perceptual differences. More broadly, they show how behavioral phenotyping can move beyond averaging across fixed stimulus sets toward optimized assays that identify the conditions under which neurodivergent perception diverges or converges.
Submission history
Access Paper:

Current browse context:
References & Citations
BibTeX formatted citation


arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Verified source · arXiv.org
Reported by arXiv.org. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Research
All newsOverthinking: Amplifying Reasoning Weights to Extract Learned Secrets
arXiv:2607.08173v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Black box auditing of language models is an essential pre-deployment tool, but it may miss subtle forms of misalignment and hidden information. To better elicit hidden information during an auditing process, we introduce \emph{over…
Read at arXiv cs.AIPolyUQuest: Verifiable Structure-Aware Web RAG over Heterogeneous Graphs
arXiv:2607.08269v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems treat web pages as flat text, losing the structural and semantic signals encoded in HTML. We present PolyUQuest, a verifiable, structure-aware web RAG framework built on a heter…
Read at arXiv cs.AIAnswer Set Programming Energised! End-to-End Neurosymbolic Reasoning and Learning with ASP and Energy Based Models
arXiv:2607.08136v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a general neurosymbolic reasoning and learning methodology based on a modular integration of answer set programming with an energy based model substrate. Key contributions are: (1) supporting joint optimisation in the co…
Read at arXiv cs.AIBlind-Spots-Bench: Evaluating Blind Spots in Multimodal Models
arXiv:2607.08317v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern AI models achieve strong performance on many established benchmarks, yet they still fail on tasks that humans find almost trivial, such as manipulating a string or drawing a dog with five legs. These examples suggest that ex…
Read at arXiv cs.AI