Polestar owners left ‘holding the bag’ after EV brand pulls out of the US

The recent decision to stop sales in the US has left many Polestar owners and dealers scrambling to figure out their future.


Last month, Polestar shocked the auto industry when it announced that it was pulling out of the US .
The EV company’s decision came after the federal government denied its authorization to continue selling its cars despite a rule banning vehicles with Chinese-made connected vehicle software . Polestar, which is headquartered in Sweden but majority owned by China’s Geely, said it would stop selling its vehicles in the US starting with the 2027 model year.
For the thousands of Polestar owners and dozens of dealers in the US, it was a moment of disappointment and uncertainty. What would happen with their vehicles? Who would service them? Would they still get software updates? And at a time of record-high rates of EV depreciation, what would happen to the value of their cars? With these questions swirling, many are now looking around for someone to blame — and are not coming up with any obvious answers.
“It feels like we’re the ones left holding the bag, with no compensation for the sudden loss in market value on cars we just bought or leased,” said DL Byron , an inventor and content creator from Washington state, who picked up a certified pre-owned Polestar 2 just days before the company announced it was shutting down in the US. “At this point I have to trust that Polestar will honor its warranty and service commitments.”
Volvo, which is also majority owned by Geely, has received authorization from the Commerce Department to keep selling its vehicles in the US despite its Chinese ties — a fact that also burns Polestar owners.
“The ‘brand‑within‑a‑brand’ model failed in the U.S., and that’s on Polestar — not on the owners who bought in,” Byron told The Verge . “We deserve better.”
Matthew Haiken, who owns a Polestar dealership in Short Hills, New Jersey, says that state franchise laws typically provide protections if an automaker goes bankrupt or voluntarily leaves the US market. Those protections exist because dealers make substantial investments that cannot easily be repurposed, including exclusive Polestar signage, long-term real estate leases, and specialized replacement parts.
But this situation is different, since Polestar isn’t going bankrupt or pulling out of the US because of low sales. Instead, it’s being muscled out by a Biden-era rule that prohibits the sale of any vehicle with connectivity software that originates from “countries of concern,” which includes China, Russia, and Iran.
Verified source · The Verge
Reported by The Verge. Open the original for full media and formatting.
More in Policy
All newsWho Analyses the Analyser? Self-Validating LLM Hazard Analysis with Constitutional Meta-STPA
arXiv:2607.08054v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly trusted to draft the artifacts of safety analysis such as, losses, hazards, Unsafe Control Actions (UCAs), and safety constraints, inside rigorous processes such as Systems-Theoretic…
Read at arXiv cs.AIEfficient Safety Alignment of Language Models via Latent Personality Traits
arXiv:2607.07918v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current safety methods for large language models are known to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, motivating research into robust alternatives. Latent Adversarial Training (LAT) is among the most effective defenses, but can deg…
Read at arXiv cs.AIMultimodal Unlearning Across Vision, Language, Video, and Audio: Survey of Methods, Datasets, and Benchmarks
arXiv:2607.07907v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the growing adoption of VLMs, DMs, LLMs, and AFMs, these multimodal foundation models can inadvertently encode sensitive, copyrighted, biased, or unsafe cross-modal associations that originate from their training data. Retra…
Read at arXiv cs.AIWhen Synthetic Speech Is All You Have: Better Call GRPO
arXiv:2607.08409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based ASR adapted to regulated domains such as banking is bottlenecked by privacy: real speech is costly and legally constrained to collect, making synthetic text-to-speech (TTS) an attractive substitute. Yet synthetic speech…
Read at arXiv cs.AI